Thor Racing Iphone 3g Case

Iran itself will produce complexes C300? Still swept dyadshku Sam?

[Iran.ZRK C-300. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad]
Iran ... Iran ... and again, Iran ...
How many solves this word in the current international relations ...
about this country and the situation around her, I have several times wrote:

• We conduct an independent policy on Iran?
• regular pressure on North Korea and Iran.
• Another pressure on the DPRK and Iran. Part 2.
• When Iran and the DPRK will be left alone? Or another pressure on North Korea and Iran, part 3

In these articles says a lot about the vicissitudes of the Iranian "nuclear program" (it is in inverted commas) around Ahmadinejad, etc.

In the article "We conduct an independent policy on Iran, "I wrote that Medvedev upset decision to ban transfers to Iran of MANPADS C300. The contract for the supply was made a long time ago, but delayed delivery of all time and now, after the UN resolution against Iran, Medvedev has decided to suspend the execution of the contract.

cite excerpt from the article I wrote ...

Everything is clear, we are still dependent, with much ... Voted in the UN Security Council for sanctions, which Forbids us to fulfill their contractual obligations to Iran. Abandoned the transaction, the sum of $ 800mln. So also banned from entering the citizens of Iran, which in any related to the "nuclear" program in Russia.

After reading all this, and disappointed, I thought it would no longer anything I was surprised, but there it was!

That was produced by control shot: U.S. welcomes Russia's decision not to supply missiles C-300 in Iran, told reporters Wednesday in New York, White House spokesman.

"The U.S. government believes that this decision indicates of good cooperation between the U.S. and Russia to strengthen global security ".

And today read the news and was glad ...

In the near future Iran will itself produce anti-missile (SAM), S-300. As reported by Iranian news agency Mehr, Iran's Defense Minister Ahmed Vahidi. He also said that Iran based on international law will achieve compensation from Russia for refusing to execute a contract for the supply of Iran's defense COMPLEX data. "We ourselves will soon be able to produce such complexes," - he said.

So what happens? Iranians a few months ago could not produce such complexes, but now can they? After all, if they could do that, then 100% would have made such a statement in which would give the whole world understand that they are in this matter are independent ... Mahmoud Ahmadinejad likes to talk about the achievements of his country, those technologies to they go and achieve, and so on ...

So, I think if we could, we would say about it ...

Why does Iran C300 or similar weapons? Correct to protect themselves from Israeli and American aggression. And it does need only to Iran? No, of course, neither Russia nor China, nor Turkey, nor Brazil does not want war Persian Gulf, especially if the other side of the barricades will be anglosaksony ...

Does anyone have the technology C300? Did Turkey? Maybe in Brazil? Oh no of course they are only in Russia ... So with whose help Iran would "produce similar complexes? I think that's obvious ...

Thus, I personally put Another plus in the treasury Medvedev on Russian foreign policy ... (I recently wrote a post about that in a recent foreign policy moves are annoying Medvedev: 2010. Need Putin and not Medvedev. (Liberali from their chairs down, probably).
We did as asked for "them", thus avoiding a regular stress relations with the West. However, just as he entered China and ...

In politics, if you will, honest crushed, and not blink an eye. Especially when "you"-Russia and its ally, as "they" - the "democratic", "civilized" state ...

If you play a game in which, mainly, so far, is your enemy, then you have to play by its rules. Play by its rules, rack up points and get up in his place ...

foe played out so hard? And you play well ... It funds terrorist organizations, who blow you and have you got? And you are funded and helped by his enemies. After all, in politics, "enemy of my enemy, my friend!

My version is not the ultimate truth. But I think that she has a right to exist ...

What is your version? What do you think is that? I would be interested to look at events from different points of view ...

__________________________________________________________________________________

Dear reader, if you like material and the blog in general, become "constant reader." Thank you in advance.
Waiting for your comments

__________________________________________________________________________________

Enter your email address:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Side Effect Bad Taste

France-the most democratic country in the world! Disagree? Then we go to you \u0026lt;-

[Frantsiya.Zabastovki in Frantsii.Pensionnaya reform in France]

We, more than 20 years asserting that Europe-it-all, that democracy is all that the U.S., Britain, France and Germany is the most-most of the country! What they want from us? Want us to become democratic? And what democracy is, they know something? It seems to me, but I'm even sure that none of them from Western leaders did not see democracy in the face.

In our time, democracy is simply an instrument through which the West directs policies of certain countries, groups of countries on track!

Germany and France are the locomotives of the European Union. Without them, this "alliance" in which nobody thinks of another ally, would not exist. And what happens? If Europe is one of the most ideal and democratic places in the world, then, logically, its leaders are also those! But it is not so ...

In recent years, according to different news channels and reported strikes, rallies, riots in France. All of them are related to pension reform that increases the retirement age from 60 to 62 years. Now the French to retire in 60 years if they previously paid pension contributions for 40.5 years and 65 years, if paid less deductions of this period. The government plans to raise the bar, respectively, to 62 and 67 years.

Bulletins News from France evoke the feeling that the news does not come from the European "citadel" of democracy, political correctness and human rights, and from Somalia, Namibia or any of Burkina Faso ...

• "On October 12 in some industries have started an indefinite strike. The country does not operate refineries refineries, oil depots with fuel seized, 20% petrol stations of the country there is no fuel. In cities across the country are daily demonstrations in which young people actively involved. With demonstrators mingle thugs, and protests are often translate into trouble. From October 12 all over the country were arrested about 2,2 thousand people. "

My comment: Imagine if all this was happening in Russia. If it were detained More than 2000 people, if they were closed most of the petrol stations if hundreds of thousands of people demanded the abolition of the reform, and the authorities did not hear them. What if would happen? I can at vskidku name a few titles of Western "independent" newspapers on this case: "Putin is indifferent to people." "Russia is again the repression." "A black hole is black hole." "There was no democracy in Russia and not her!" "Stalin is back ..." and so on in this spirit

• "Disgruntled pension reform of the second day, blocking access to the largest in France centered on recycling, which is located in the Paris suburb of Ivry-sur-Seine "

• protests against pension reforms will be continued in France for more than a week. The country does not work nearly all refineries, daily demonstrators blocking the fuel depots, access roads to airports and other facilities. At gas stations across the country felt shortages of fuel, difficult traffic, continuing the protest of youth, which often turn into clashes with police.

• French police force unblocked refinery near the city Granpyui (Grandpuits) on the outskirts of Paris gendarmes \u0026lt;...> were forced to "crush" the ranks of disaffected, three of whom were injured. One of the protesters at the ambulance car was hospitalized in the nearest hospital.

So what? What kind of results given the free will of the French? This right is enshrined by the Constitution of France. President elected by the people, serves the people and go if you want people ... Is not it us a strong EU, U.S., England, midfielder human rights "? THIS! But it's all just for us, not them! Why? Read the following news and everything will fall into place:

"French Senate after three weeks of debate, voted for the pension reform, demonstrations and strikes against which are held throughout strane.obyavil on Friday, vice-speaker of the upper house of the French parliament, Bernard Frima.Reformu supported by 177 senators, against - 153, nine abstained. A total of 339 senators voted. "

"\u0026lt;...> Government exercised its constitutional law and demanded the Senate vote as soon as possible. The government can not prohibit the introduction of the opposition of many amendments, but has the right to impose a vote for the entire text at once, to avoid voting on each amendment separately. "

As a result we get? A get what they wanted to spit on his people, this democracy, that nobody wants! Important for them to push them to the right bill, the reform and all! Rest nonsense and it does not matter! "What is Democracy?" Ahh, do you mean the one about which we will tell tales? So it is not for us and for you. We do not need it, yet! "That's when the need will invade Iran or North Korea, then I remembered her, because these countries are quite nedemokratichinye "!

PSPomnite when in Iran after election authorities disperse the demonstrators? Remember! What comments were? Right!: "Ahmadinejad is a tyrant," "Iran is no democracy," etc.
And what now? NO!
Even with our hand did not write and do not say! On the one hand sad that do not use the momentum, on the other side, and it is necessary to us? We still have "Mistrals" buy, we still have to bring Disorder in the EU, with France and Germany. We have yet to discuss the European security architecture, and so on ... (That's what I wrote in the article http://sergeypolitnews.blogspot.com/2010/10/2012.html )

small photoreport:

"Eternal Dissent" take an example! Need to collect a contingent of people from different ages and social status, with it voluntarily, not retirees, 500rubley consonants for a few hours to attend the rally and poorat something on account of Putin's and 31 articles of the Constitution!

What noise would be raised, whether in the CIS is. ..

democracy from the people, and for the people ... I do not want a democracy

We need a democracy? Worth Whether chasing this idea? I think you answer yourself!

__________________________________________________________________________________

Dear reader, if you liked the material and the blog as a whole, become "constant reader." Thank you in advance.
Waiting for your comments

__________________________________________________________________________________

Enter your email address:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Reprogram Insignia Remote

"Reporters Without Borders, or dog does not bite, nursing her hand!

[Reporters Without Granits.Reyting]
yesterday published a report of Reporters Without Borders "
In order to proceed to discuss some of the highlights of this report, we need to understand what this organization and what she breathes. "
information from Wikipedia: Reporters Without Borders is an international non-governmental organization advocating for freedom of expression worldwide. The organization fights against censorship and for the release of journalists imprisoned because of their professional activities. In this case, the organization relies in paragraph 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. organization was founded in 1 985godu in Paris.

created something it is in Paris, but if you go to site , we can see that the emphasis is on the U.S.. Under "About Us", there is no section of Reporters Without Borders in France, "but" Reporters Without Borders in the U.S.. "I think no one even doubted that they are oriented primarily to the States.

Now to yesterday publication ranking. I, initially, most of it was interesting how things have changed the position of Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan and Poland in this list. Not thinking about Russia, it and so, according to a "free" organization, is somewhere on the level of Iraq. I did not think about China, and so clear, where it will be ...
Why am I interested in these countries?





In these general changes have occurred ... Although varying degrees. Ukraine-establishment of relations with Russia. Pro-Russian president. Signed an agreement on the Black Sea Fleet. Frequent trips to Russia, Yanukovich.
Kyrgyzstan - change of power (this I wrote an article titled "Again troubled Bakiyev. The history of the Kyrgyz revolution after half a year" - http://sergeypolitnews.blogspot.com/2010/10/blog-post. html )
current rule was largely pro-Russian than the previous one. While the previous one, was brought to power the West and served for the West.
Poland-up to the tragedy of the highest by Poland, Russia's relations with it were no. Now, on the contrary, active negotiations, officials meet to discuss different issues. That is, to some extent, an anti-Russian policies of Poland has changed ...

So, I think, to read the ratings, something had to change ...

"The document's authors attributed sharp drop Ukraine's rating (from 90 th to 131 th) with a" stable deterioration "of press freedom since the election of Viktor Yanukovych president in February 2010. in Ukrainian media space, according to Reporters Without Borders, returns to censorship, there are also conflicts of interest. Philippines, Ukraine, Greece and Kyrgyzstan are leaders to drop in the level of press freedom in the current year "-
http://news.zn.ua/news/47383

But Poland has risen by rating. What surprised me." Although I think their "misconduct" You can not ignore. After all, Americans have all there are still plans for missile defense. And Poland in the matter is very necessary!
And where, according to Reporters Without Borders "is a good trend to promote freedom of expression and stability in this matter? Of course, in Japan, Australia, USA, Canada, Great Britain. It is not a simple yet they all stand side by side in one list- http://en.rsf.org/press-freedom-index-2010, 1034.html
One well-known German journalist at the press conference said the following:

"organization criticizes only hostile With Sha countries, such as K Uba , Belarus or Russia. At the same time friendly regimes the United States, such as, for example, the Philippines or Saudi Arabia, where freedom of speech is almost entirely absent, are not subject to any criticism by this organization. Also available estimation with respect to freedom of speech in Western countries themselves "

Yes, indeed, in CA to execute people on the street, and the" democratic "reports about human rights "Halfbacks" does not remember and do not despise the Saudi Arabia ...

Why do we still believe and hope that some kind of alien organization will praise us? Why are we all still dependent on their assessment? This is their assessment! Let's create another organization, with its center in Moscow, she will be objective? Never!


Waiting for your comments ...
__________________________________________________________________________________

Dear reader, if you liked the material and the blog in general, become "constant reader." Thank you in advance.
COMMENT

__________________________________________________________________________________

Enter your email address:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Does Forever 21 Do The Buy Now Pay Later?

2012. Need Putin and not Medvedev! (The Liberals have fallen from their chairs, probably)

[Medvedev.Putin.Myunhenskaya Conference]
Hello dear readers of my blog. Today I would like to write about the ruling tandem, if it now can be called.
I, in principle, support such a "form of government." Why not? No harm will be a country if its 2 top executives will work together. In 2008, when Putin's successor Medvedev began, I supported him. He led the foreign policy of those tracks that paved Putin. He understood that he himself is no authority in the country, there is no popular support and governmental circles to do something as he pleases.

And it went somewhere about two years. Medvedev's name confused with the name of Putin, he is often asked about who really runs the country, etc. I myself, passing on the Kremlin embankment, looked at the Kremlin and caught myself thinking that I think is not about Medvedev, as president, but about Putin.
But suddenly, it all prekratilos.Seychas we see that Medvedev is gaining momentum. He, of course, depend very much on Putin's (and if by Putin, that means from the population because most people support not Dmitry and Vladimir).

What for me was the signal, saying that Medvedev starts to go away from the care?



Firstly, it there was a parade on May 9 and his statement on the threshold of the Victory Day. He forbade the city to hang a portrait of Stalin, the man who led the country in such a difficult time and won the war. It does not matter who is who he thinks he did and what did not, but it is credited. On Victory Day, one can give permission for certain time to hang out in some parts of Moscow Stalin's portrait with the inscription, for example, "supervised the Soviet Union during WWII, when it comes to that. I am his step, not much liked. Putin would not have done! He has not forgotten to history, whatever it was! This is a more dignified behavior than poddakivanie West ...

Secondly, I was disgusted hear from the President of the Russian Federation that it was the Soviet soldiers killed Poles in the Katyn! I have read many sources on this topic, many materials of different authors, and can say with confidence that the shot Poles Soviet and German soldiers. Soviets could not do it physically (I think, as a write about this episode of history). By order of the Medvedev were discovered and published some documents, which allegedly confirmed the fact of "Katyn crime." I understand that this is politics, I understand that the sacrifice of historical pamyatyu.Medvedev qualitatively improved relations with Poland. However, one would look for other Methods ... I think Putin would have coped with it better. Over 8 years of his leadership was not uttered a single word that would not go side-by-side with the Russian and Soviet history.

such examples, where Medvedev wants to show that, say "we're all so good, it is not necessary for us to be angry, better make friends with us," very, very many (for example, START, Development theme entry into WTO, etc. Who cares what I mean, ask questions in the comments).

Russia and the former The Soviet Union a very different path of development! Need not do so, as do out there, beyond the ocean. You need to look at them, make their own conclusions and act, given the our common factors!

And today, I will give another example, which has finally led me to think that Medvedev's time to retire. I'm not saying that he's a traitor! I'm not saying that does not support it and go to the "opposition"! No, he is building a foreign policy based on the interests of the country, he does what he must do. But he prefers to "apologize" and go ahead and enjoy "the other" (apparently this is "complex" of a disabled President, as if it did not sound rude) ... And it may be disastrous ... Not bos, then sunk to an apology for "the occupation of Finland, Ruymnii flattered, etc."
in Moscow yesterday held an exit meeting of the Munich security conference. It took part and Medvedev. He spoke on various topics. Spoke about his views on European security system. Raised the issue of NATO, EU and others.

Next, I quote from the President's speech and give your comment.

"Relations between Russia and NATO has always been difficult. Maybe it's inherited, plus emotions, feelings, people's perceptions. We all have some historical background. This certainly aggravates our relationship, including including relations with NATO "

My comment: Dear Mr. President, this is not" can be inherited, plus emotions, it's historical memory. What has both a conscious as well and on a subconscious level. You know better than me and why was created by the North Atlantic Alliance. So speak up straight! What is there in front of all sorts Brzezinski ape? He is Russia in their books compares with a "black hole", and you flirted with him!

He agreed with the statements of members of the conference to the effect that in Russia there is a feeling that NATO is a kind of aggressive components in relation to Russia. "

"And probably, this is largely misleading. But it is also clear that often Russia is perceived by the Western world , ordinary people as a country, where never can not be a democracy, leadership is always committed to the authoritarian principles and which does not want to grow together with the other world, "- said President of the Russian Federation.

My comment: Why is "probably, this is largely misleading." Know perfectly well that no it is not confusing! Everybody understands you better than us and that NATO (primarily) is an anti-Russian project. And if more precise, antiBYVShESOYuZNY. So, why again bow our heads in those places where we are right? And then what will be during those situations where we will be wrong in something?

I was surprised when he again thought of the "Katyn affair". Why speak again on this subject I do not understand ...

Medvedev said on his way to a meeting, he read on the internet about how "our Communist Party is trying to refute the findings of relevant Commission on the Katyn case ".

" There are no comments. I have already given their comments . But this force, which has some support in our country, people are standing behind it "- said the head of state.

According to him, this example shows that there are similar assessments in other countries, have the power, "which occupy a very tough position, but this does not mean that we should abandon the free and open communication."

Who cares, I can offer material written by Nicholas Starikov, where he denied all the accusations about the case.

My opinion is. I do not like when a person cherishes and tends a stranger. For example, Caucasian, lives in Moscow, should primarily be kavakaztsem, but taking the basic norms of decency and life in Russia gorode.Russky living in America, to be Russian, not American Russian. Japanese man living in France, must remain Japanese. But if you live in their own country, then live the way you profitable and convenient, and live by their rules, rather than adjust to strangers. That's me to the fact that Russian President should not seek like the West, as it makes Medvedev. He should strive to do what you want his country, its people, its economy, etc.

What Your opinion? What makes Medvedev from Putin? Who needed in 2012?

__________________________________________________________________________________

Dear reader, if you liked the material and the blog as a whole, become "constant reader." Thank you in advance.
COMMENT

__________________________________________________________________________________

Enter your email address:


Delivered by FeedBurner