Side Effect Bad Taste

France-the most democratic country in the world! Disagree? Then we go to you \u0026lt;-

[Frantsiya.Zabastovki in Frantsii.Pensionnaya reform in France]

We, more than 20 years asserting that Europe-it-all, that democracy is all that the U.S., Britain, France and Germany is the most-most of the country! What they want from us? Want us to become democratic? And what democracy is, they know something? It seems to me, but I'm even sure that none of them from Western leaders did not see democracy in the face.

In our time, democracy is simply an instrument through which the West directs policies of certain countries, groups of countries on track!

Germany and France are the locomotives of the European Union. Without them, this "alliance" in which nobody thinks of another ally, would not exist. And what happens? If Europe is one of the most ideal and democratic places in the world, then, logically, its leaders are also those! But it is not so ...

In recent years, according to different news channels and reported strikes, rallies, riots in France. All of them are related to pension reform that increases the retirement age from 60 to 62 years. Now the French to retire in 60 years if they previously paid pension contributions for 40.5 years and 65 years, if paid less deductions of this period. The government plans to raise the bar, respectively, to 62 and 67 years.

Bulletins News from France evoke the feeling that the news does not come from the European "citadel" of democracy, political correctness and human rights, and from Somalia, Namibia or any of Burkina Faso ...

• "On October 12 in some industries have started an indefinite strike. The country does not operate refineries refineries, oil depots with fuel seized, 20% petrol stations of the country there is no fuel. In cities across the country are daily demonstrations in which young people actively involved. With demonstrators mingle thugs, and protests are often translate into trouble. From October 12 all over the country were arrested about 2,2 thousand people. "

My comment: Imagine if all this was happening in Russia. If it were detained More than 2000 people, if they were closed most of the petrol stations if hundreds of thousands of people demanded the abolition of the reform, and the authorities did not hear them. What if would happen? I can at vskidku name a few titles of Western "independent" newspapers on this case: "Putin is indifferent to people." "Russia is again the repression." "A black hole is black hole." "There was no democracy in Russia and not her!" "Stalin is back ..." and so on in this spirit

• "Disgruntled pension reform of the second day, blocking access to the largest in France centered on recycling, which is located in the Paris suburb of Ivry-sur-Seine "

• protests against pension reforms will be continued in France for more than a week. The country does not work nearly all refineries, daily demonstrators blocking the fuel depots, access roads to airports and other facilities. At gas stations across the country felt shortages of fuel, difficult traffic, continuing the protest of youth, which often turn into clashes with police.

• French police force unblocked refinery near the city Granpyui (Grandpuits) on the outskirts of Paris gendarmes \u0026lt;...> were forced to "crush" the ranks of disaffected, three of whom were injured. One of the protesters at the ambulance car was hospitalized in the nearest hospital.

So what? What kind of results given the free will of the French? This right is enshrined by the Constitution of France. President elected by the people, serves the people and go if you want people ... Is not it us a strong EU, U.S., England, midfielder human rights "? THIS! But it's all just for us, not them! Why? Read the following news and everything will fall into place:

"French Senate after three weeks of debate, voted for the pension reform, demonstrations and strikes against which are held throughout strane.obyavil on Friday, vice-speaker of the upper house of the French parliament, Bernard Frima.Reformu supported by 177 senators, against - 153, nine abstained. A total of 339 senators voted. "

"\u0026lt;...> Government exercised its constitutional law and demanded the Senate vote as soon as possible. The government can not prohibit the introduction of the opposition of many amendments, but has the right to impose a vote for the entire text at once, to avoid voting on each amendment separately. "

As a result we get? A get what they wanted to spit on his people, this democracy, that nobody wants! Important for them to push them to the right bill, the reform and all! Rest nonsense and it does not matter! "What is Democracy?" Ahh, do you mean the one about which we will tell tales? So it is not for us and for you. We do not need it, yet! "That's when the need will invade Iran or North Korea, then I remembered her, because these countries are quite nedemokratichinye "!

PSPomnite when in Iran after election authorities disperse the demonstrators? Remember! What comments were? Right!: "Ahmadinejad is a tyrant," "Iran is no democracy," etc.
And what now? NO!
Even with our hand did not write and do not say! On the one hand sad that do not use the momentum, on the other side, and it is necessary to us? We still have "Mistrals" buy, we still have to bring Disorder in the EU, with France and Germany. We have yet to discuss the European security architecture, and so on ... (That's what I wrote in the article http://sergeypolitnews.blogspot.com/2010/10/2012.html )

small photoreport:

"Eternal Dissent" take an example! Need to collect a contingent of people from different ages and social status, with it voluntarily, not retirees, 500rubley consonants for a few hours to attend the rally and poorat something on account of Putin's and 31 articles of the Constitution!

What noise would be raised, whether in the CIS is. ..

democracy from the people, and for the people ... I do not want a democracy

We need a democracy? Worth Whether chasing this idea? I think you answer yourself!

__________________________________________________________________________________

Dear reader, if you liked the material and the blog as a whole, become "constant reader." Thank you in advance.
Waiting for your comments

__________________________________________________________________________________

Enter your email address:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Reprogram Insignia Remote

"Reporters Without Borders, or dog does not bite, nursing her hand!

[Reporters Without Granits.Reyting]
yesterday published a report of Reporters Without Borders "
In order to proceed to discuss some of the highlights of this report, we need to understand what this organization and what she breathes. "
information from Wikipedia: Reporters Without Borders is an international non-governmental organization advocating for freedom of expression worldwide. The organization fights against censorship and for the release of journalists imprisoned because of their professional activities. In this case, the organization relies in paragraph 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. organization was founded in 1 985godu in Paris.

created something it is in Paris, but if you go to site , we can see that the emphasis is on the U.S.. Under "About Us", there is no section of Reporters Without Borders in France, "but" Reporters Without Borders in the U.S.. "I think no one even doubted that they are oriented primarily to the States.

Now to yesterday publication ranking. I, initially, most of it was interesting how things have changed the position of Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan and Poland in this list. Not thinking about Russia, it and so, according to a "free" organization, is somewhere on the level of Iraq. I did not think about China, and so clear, where it will be ...
Why am I interested in these countries?





In these general changes have occurred ... Although varying degrees. Ukraine-establishment of relations with Russia. Pro-Russian president. Signed an agreement on the Black Sea Fleet. Frequent trips to Russia, Yanukovich.
Kyrgyzstan - change of power (this I wrote an article titled "Again troubled Bakiyev. The history of the Kyrgyz revolution after half a year" - http://sergeypolitnews.blogspot.com/2010/10/blog-post. html )
current rule was largely pro-Russian than the previous one. While the previous one, was brought to power the West and served for the West.
Poland-up to the tragedy of the highest by Poland, Russia's relations with it were no. Now, on the contrary, active negotiations, officials meet to discuss different issues. That is, to some extent, an anti-Russian policies of Poland has changed ...

So, I think, to read the ratings, something had to change ...

"The document's authors attributed sharp drop Ukraine's rating (from 90 th to 131 th) with a" stable deterioration "of press freedom since the election of Viktor Yanukovych president in February 2010. in Ukrainian media space, according to Reporters Without Borders, returns to censorship, there are also conflicts of interest. Philippines, Ukraine, Greece and Kyrgyzstan are leaders to drop in the level of press freedom in the current year "-
http://news.zn.ua/news/47383

But Poland has risen by rating. What surprised me." Although I think their "misconduct" You can not ignore. After all, Americans have all there are still plans for missile defense. And Poland in the matter is very necessary!
And where, according to Reporters Without Borders "is a good trend to promote freedom of expression and stability in this matter? Of course, in Japan, Australia, USA, Canada, Great Britain. It is not a simple yet they all stand side by side in one list- http://en.rsf.org/press-freedom-index-2010, 1034.html
One well-known German journalist at the press conference said the following:

"organization criticizes only hostile With Sha countries, such as K Uba , Belarus or Russia. At the same time friendly regimes the United States, such as, for example, the Philippines or Saudi Arabia, where freedom of speech is almost entirely absent, are not subject to any criticism by this organization. Also available estimation with respect to freedom of speech in Western countries themselves "

Yes, indeed, in CA to execute people on the street, and the" democratic "reports about human rights "Halfbacks" does not remember and do not despise the Saudi Arabia ...

Why do we still believe and hope that some kind of alien organization will praise us? Why are we all still dependent on their assessment? This is their assessment! Let's create another organization, with its center in Moscow, she will be objective? Never!


Waiting for your comments ...
__________________________________________________________________________________

Dear reader, if you liked the material and the blog in general, become "constant reader." Thank you in advance.
COMMENT

__________________________________________________________________________________

Enter your email address:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Does Forever 21 Do The Buy Now Pay Later?

2012. Need Putin and not Medvedev! (The Liberals have fallen from their chairs, probably)

[Medvedev.Putin.Myunhenskaya Conference]
Hello dear readers of my blog. Today I would like to write about the ruling tandem, if it now can be called.
I, in principle, support such a "form of government." Why not? No harm will be a country if its 2 top executives will work together. In 2008, when Putin's successor Medvedev began, I supported him. He led the foreign policy of those tracks that paved Putin. He understood that he himself is no authority in the country, there is no popular support and governmental circles to do something as he pleases.

And it went somewhere about two years. Medvedev's name confused with the name of Putin, he is often asked about who really runs the country, etc. I myself, passing on the Kremlin embankment, looked at the Kremlin and caught myself thinking that I think is not about Medvedev, as president, but about Putin.
But suddenly, it all prekratilos.Seychas we see that Medvedev is gaining momentum. He, of course, depend very much on Putin's (and if by Putin, that means from the population because most people support not Dmitry and Vladimir).

What for me was the signal, saying that Medvedev starts to go away from the care?



Firstly, it there was a parade on May 9 and his statement on the threshold of the Victory Day. He forbade the city to hang a portrait of Stalin, the man who led the country in such a difficult time and won the war. It does not matter who is who he thinks he did and what did not, but it is credited. On Victory Day, one can give permission for certain time to hang out in some parts of Moscow Stalin's portrait with the inscription, for example, "supervised the Soviet Union during WWII, when it comes to that. I am his step, not much liked. Putin would not have done! He has not forgotten to history, whatever it was! This is a more dignified behavior than poddakivanie West ...

Secondly, I was disgusted hear from the President of the Russian Federation that it was the Soviet soldiers killed Poles in the Katyn! I have read many sources on this topic, many materials of different authors, and can say with confidence that the shot Poles Soviet and German soldiers. Soviets could not do it physically (I think, as a write about this episode of history). By order of the Medvedev were discovered and published some documents, which allegedly confirmed the fact of "Katyn crime." I understand that this is politics, I understand that the sacrifice of historical pamyatyu.Medvedev qualitatively improved relations with Poland. However, one would look for other Methods ... I think Putin would have coped with it better. Over 8 years of his leadership was not uttered a single word that would not go side-by-side with the Russian and Soviet history.

such examples, where Medvedev wants to show that, say "we're all so good, it is not necessary for us to be angry, better make friends with us," very, very many (for example, START, Development theme entry into WTO, etc. Who cares what I mean, ask questions in the comments).

Russia and the former The Soviet Union a very different path of development! Need not do so, as do out there, beyond the ocean. You need to look at them, make their own conclusions and act, given the our common factors!

And today, I will give another example, which has finally led me to think that Medvedev's time to retire. I'm not saying that he's a traitor! I'm not saying that does not support it and go to the "opposition"! No, he is building a foreign policy based on the interests of the country, he does what he must do. But he prefers to "apologize" and go ahead and enjoy "the other" (apparently this is "complex" of a disabled President, as if it did not sound rude) ... And it may be disastrous ... Not bos, then sunk to an apology for "the occupation of Finland, Ruymnii flattered, etc."
in Moscow yesterday held an exit meeting of the Munich security conference. It took part and Medvedev. He spoke on various topics. Spoke about his views on European security system. Raised the issue of NATO, EU and others.

Next, I quote from the President's speech and give your comment.

"Relations between Russia and NATO has always been difficult. Maybe it's inherited, plus emotions, feelings, people's perceptions. We all have some historical background. This certainly aggravates our relationship, including including relations with NATO "

My comment: Dear Mr. President, this is not" can be inherited, plus emotions, it's historical memory. What has both a conscious as well and on a subconscious level. You know better than me and why was created by the North Atlantic Alliance. So speak up straight! What is there in front of all sorts Brzezinski ape? He is Russia in their books compares with a "black hole", and you flirted with him!

He agreed with the statements of members of the conference to the effect that in Russia there is a feeling that NATO is a kind of aggressive components in relation to Russia. "

"And probably, this is largely misleading. But it is also clear that often Russia is perceived by the Western world , ordinary people as a country, where never can not be a democracy, leadership is always committed to the authoritarian principles and which does not want to grow together with the other world, "- said President of the Russian Federation.

My comment: Why is "probably, this is largely misleading." Know perfectly well that no it is not confusing! Everybody understands you better than us and that NATO (primarily) is an anti-Russian project. And if more precise, antiBYVShESOYuZNY. So, why again bow our heads in those places where we are right? And then what will be during those situations where we will be wrong in something?

I was surprised when he again thought of the "Katyn affair". Why speak again on this subject I do not understand ...

Medvedev said on his way to a meeting, he read on the internet about how "our Communist Party is trying to refute the findings of relevant Commission on the Katyn case ".

" There are no comments. I have already given their comments . But this force, which has some support in our country, people are standing behind it "- said the head of state.

According to him, this example shows that there are similar assessments in other countries, have the power, "which occupy a very tough position, but this does not mean that we should abandon the free and open communication."

Who cares, I can offer material written by Nicholas Starikov, where he denied all the accusations about the case.

My opinion is. I do not like when a person cherishes and tends a stranger. For example, Caucasian, lives in Moscow, should primarily be kavakaztsem, but taking the basic norms of decency and life in Russia gorode.Russky living in America, to be Russian, not American Russian. Japanese man living in France, must remain Japanese. But if you live in their own country, then live the way you profitable and convenient, and live by their rules, rather than adjust to strangers. That's me to the fact that Russian President should not seek like the West, as it makes Medvedev. He should strive to do what you want his country, its people, its economy, etc.

What Your opinion? What makes Medvedev from Putin? Who needed in 2012?

__________________________________________________________________________________

Dear reader, if you liked the material and the blog as a whole, become "constant reader." Thank you in advance.
COMMENT

__________________________________________________________________________________

Enter your email address:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Milk On Aphthous Ulcer

Terrorist Attack in Chechnya! Who and why this day?

[Terrorist Attack in Chechnya. Caucasus. Meeting in Deauville]

yesterday in Chechnya was attacked militants in the parliament, in which killed 3 people. In principle, the terrorist attacks in the North Caucasus is now not surprise anyone. There, terrorist attacks occurred, occur and will occur because that the country is trying to undermine through the region. The fact there are many objective and subjective reasons. First, the illiterate held Chechen campaign 90s. The social situation in the region. The mentality of the indigenous population, different religion and many many other factors.

But the last time it was made very much in order to cure this region ... Many want this: Russians living in other regions of Russia and the authorities North Caucasian republics, and the very people of this complex region.

What was done to stabilize the situation in the UK, in Chechnya, in particular?

Well, for example, were built all the schools destroyed during the war. Grozny is now on statistics is one of the safest cities in Russia.

resumed pumping and selling oil at the expense of which replenishes the regional budget. And in general, everything is a statistic ... You just need to talk to those people who swirling in the pot and then everything will fall into place.

I think nobody would argue about what was better or worse in Chechnya over the past 10 years. should go there and look at all the eyes, to talk with government officials, civilians and realize that people are happy, and once people are satisfied, then who blows up and kills?

I belong to that category of people who believe that terrorist organizations can not exist without the support of intelligence services of certain countries. Everything is beneficial. All beneficial to the other state has been the lever by which to resolve certain issues. For example, Armenia, in some part, funded by the Kurdish Workers Party. The question is why? Where is Armenia, where the PKK ... But then the other account ... Turkey is opposed to Armenia and Azerbaijan funds diversion, therefore Armenia stands "for the PKK ...

Likewise, throughout the world. Only there is one, but Big difference. You can use terrorism, sabotage as a weapon of attacking, as do the United States, Britain, Israel, etc. (The September 11 attacks, terror attacks in the Moscow subway, terrorist attacks in Tajikistan), and you can use the same tools for other purposes, in order to respond to the aggressor, so that he could not do what he wants and how much wants!
My articles on similar topics:

• "Why detonated underground in Moscow?" I guess that's why ... " - http://sergeypolitnews.blogspot.com/2010/10/blog-post_6244.html
• "Tajikistan is burning" democracy "that U.S. taken to Afghanistan " - http://sergeypolitnews.blogspot.com/2010/09/blog-post_5907.html
• " Tajikistan is on fire from Afghanistan " - http://sergeypolitnews.blogspot.com/2010/10/blog-post_07.html
• "supported by Russia terrorist attacks in Tajikistan? " - http://sergeypolitnews.blogspot.com/2010/10/blog-post_19.html

Why in this day it happened in Chechnya, why not just a car exploded, and was an attack on one of the branches of government? Replies can

be a bit ...

But I think that my answer has the right to exist.

It all happened on the day in France, leaders of both countries locomotives of Europe met with Medvedev. At these meetings the questions that are not very pleasant for the U.S. and its allies.

"In the course of tripartite negotiations the sides exchanged views on the future architecture European security. In particular, they talked about the development Treaty on European security.

touched theme of Russia's relations with the European Union, including Russian-German initiative of forming Committee EU-Russia on foreign and security policy at ministerial level, and Nicolas Sarkozy's proposal to establish single space in the economic and security between Russia and the European Union. "- http://news.kremlin.ru/news/9286

known that the United States vehemently opposed the proposal Medvedev on the new structure of European security, which is not surprising. After all, they are all happy ...

What does the creation of the Committee of the Russia-EU? Convergence of positions on the basis of frequent talks at ministerial level. It also does not like America, but what can I say, no one will like it when your enemy begins to start friendship with your dog, gradually wants to get out from under the tutelage ..

In general, what do you think about this? What is the version? Why that day? Such actions, just as no plans ... They have a clear goal.

__________________________________________________________________________________

Dear reader, if you like stuff and blogs Overall, you become "constant reader." Thank you in advance.
COMMENT

__________________________________________________________________________________

Enter your email address:


Delivered by FeedBurner