Hello dear readers of my blog. Today I would like to write about the ruling tandem, if it now can be called.
I, in principle, support such a "form of government." Why not? No harm will be a country if its 2 top executives will work together. In 2008, when Putin's successor Medvedev began, I supported him. He led the foreign policy of those tracks that paved Putin. He understood that he himself is no authority in the country, there is no popular support and governmental circles to do something as he pleases.
And it went somewhere about two years. Medvedev's name confused with the name of Putin, he is often asked about who really runs the country, etc. I myself, passing on the Kremlin embankment, looked at the Kremlin and caught myself thinking that I think is not about Medvedev, as president, but about Putin.
But suddenly, it all prekratilos.Seychas we see that Medvedev is gaining momentum. He, of course, depend very much on Putin's (and if by Putin, that means from the population because most people support not Dmitry and Vladimir).
What for me was the signal, saying that Medvedev starts to go away from the care?
Firstly, it there was a parade on May 9 and his statement on the threshold of the Victory Day. He forbade the city to hang a portrait of Stalin, the man who led the country in such a difficult time and won the war. It does not matter who is who he thinks he did and what did not, but it is credited. On Victory Day, one can give permission for certain time to hang out in some parts of Moscow Stalin's portrait with the inscription, for example, "supervised the Soviet Union during WWII, when it comes to that. I am his step, not much liked. Putin would not have done! He has not forgotten to history, whatever it was! This is a more dignified behavior than poddakivanie West ...
Secondly, I was disgusted hear from the President of the Russian Federation that it was the Soviet soldiers killed Poles in the Katyn! I have read many sources on this topic, many materials of different authors, and can say with confidence that the shot Poles Soviet and German soldiers. Soviets could not do it physically (I think, as a write about this episode of history). By order of the Medvedev were discovered and published some documents, which allegedly confirmed the fact of "Katyn crime." I understand that this is politics, I understand that the sacrifice of historical pamyatyu.Medvedev qualitatively improved relations with Poland. However, one would look for other Methods ... I think Putin would have coped with it better. Over 8 years of his leadership was not uttered a single word that would not go side-by-side with the Russian and Soviet history.
such examples, where Medvedev wants to show that, say "we're all so good, it is not necessary for us to be angry, better make friends with us," very, very many (for example, START, Development theme entry into WTO, etc. Who cares what I mean, ask questions in the comments).
Russia and the former The Soviet Union a very different path of development! Need not do so, as do out there, beyond the ocean. You need to look at them, make their own conclusions and act, given the our common factors!
And today, I will give another example, which has finally led me to think that Medvedev's time to retire. I'm not saying that he's a traitor! I'm not saying that does not support it and go to the "opposition"! No, he is building a foreign policy based on the interests of the country, he does what he must do. But he prefers to "apologize" and go ahead and enjoy "the other" (apparently this is "complex" of a disabled President, as if it did not sound rude) ... And it may be disastrous ... Not bos, then sunk to an apology for "the occupation of Finland, Ruymnii flattered, etc."
in Moscow yesterday held an exit meeting of the Munich security conference. It took part and Medvedev. He spoke on various topics. Spoke about his views on European security system. Raised the issue of NATO, EU and others.
Next, I quote from the President's speech and give your comment.
"Relations between Russia and NATO has always been difficult. Maybe it's inherited, plus emotions, feelings, people's perceptions. We all have some historical background. This certainly aggravates our relationship, including including relations with NATO "My comment: Dear Mr. President, this is not" can be inherited, plus emotions, it's historical memory. What has both a conscious as well and on a subconscious level. You know better than me and why was created by the North Atlantic Alliance. So speak up straight! What is there in front of all sorts Brzezinski ape? He is Russia in their books compares with a "black hole", and you flirted with him!
He agreed with the statements of members of the conference to the effect that in Russia there is a feeling that NATO is a kind of aggressive components in relation to Russia. "
"And probably, this is largely misleading. But it is also clear that often Russia is perceived by the Western world , ordinary people as a country, where never can not be a democracy, leadership is always committed to the authoritarian principles and which does not want to grow together with the other world, "- said President of the Russian Federation.My comment: Why is "probably, this is largely misleading." Know perfectly well that no it is not confusing! Everybody understands you better than us and that NATO (primarily) is an anti-Russian project. And if more precise, antiBYVShESOYuZNY. So, why again bow our heads in those places where we are right? And then what will be during those situations where we will be wrong in something?
I was surprised when he again thought of the "Katyn affair". Why speak again on this subject I do not understand ...
Medvedev said on his way to a meeting, he read on the internet about how "our Communist Party is trying to refute the findings of relevant Commission on the Katyn case ".
" There are no comments. I have already given their comments . But this force, which has some support in our country, people are standing behind it "- said the head of state.
According to him, this example shows that there are similar assessments in other countries, have the power, "which occupy a very tough position, but this does not mean that we should abandon the free and open communication."Who cares, I can offer material written by Nicholas Starikov, where he denied all the accusations about the case.
My opinion is. I do not like when a person cherishes and tends a stranger. For example, Caucasian, lives in Moscow, should primarily be kavakaztsem, but taking the basic norms of decency and life in Russia gorode.Russky living in America, to be Russian, not American Russian. Japanese man living in France, must remain Japanese. But if you live in their own country, then live the way you profitable and convenient, and live by their rules, rather than adjust to strangers. That's me to the fact that Russian President should not seek like the West, as it makes Medvedev. He should strive to do what you want his country, its people, its economy, etc.
What Your opinion? What makes Medvedev from Putin? Who needed in 2012?
__________________________________________________________________________________
Dear reader, if you liked the material and the blog as a whole, become "constant reader." Thank you in advance.
COMMENT __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
Dear reader, if you liked the material and the blog as a whole, become "constant reader." Thank you in advance.
COMMENT
